When I started my legal career in the mid/late 90s, no-one ever talked of the CEO or the CFO. There was a Managing Partner, probably a Senior Partner, and a Finance Director.
While looking at job titles may seem simplistic, it actually throws up some interesting trends (and I’m not repeating my rant about putting the words “equity partner” on your business card). In some firms, the adoption of the CEO and CFO titles genuinely represents a shift to a more corporate structure, where the executive have more authority. This was required as firms became more complex and more distributed – the slow, consensual nature of partnership was hampering firms’ ability to move at the pace required by the market, and a changing governance structure was one response.
Another interesting change was the emergence of the COO, showing in many firms a need to separate the day to day operations from the other issues such as people, strategy and technology. Strange thought it may seem now, twenty years ago it would not have been common for a firm to have an HR Director, a Business Development Director or an IT Director. These emergence of these new roles is partly a response to the increased scale of law firms, but also a recognition that to be successful in law these days, there’s more involved in the business than simply providing legal advice.
More recently still we’ve seen the rise of the CKO (chief knowledge officer) and CIO (chief information officer) in law firms, and also the CLO (chief legal officer) as an alternative to general counsel in the corporate world.
And this brings me to the title of the post – an alternative meaning for CLO. The answer comes in a post (set out below in italics) from the prolific and thought-provoking legal blogger, Julian Summerhayes about the role of the managing partner.
To my mind, listening, the critical skill Julian references, is critical for all lawyers, not just in their legal work, but also in their selling (see number one in my list of top lawyer sales fails). So whether you’re a managing partner or not, read on and reflect on how practising and developing this skill might help you:
Most managing partners that I have met describe their role as like herding cats.
You know the score: two lawyers can’t agree the time of day. And you magnify that up to include the plethora of issues, including the big one – PEP – and is it any wonder that poor old managing partner feels like s/he is dealing with a swarm of angry bees?
What do you think is the role of your firm’s managing partner?
- Political strategist?
- Tough negotiator?
I’ll give you my view:
CHIEF LISTENING OFFICER (CLO).
And not the sort of listening you normally observe which, at best, skims the surface and never really understands the issue. No, someone who is so intensely focused on listening to you that it is scary.
Scary in what sense?
Scary in the sense that you know they deeply care about you and your needs. They are not constantly scoping the conversation to make their point, or talk in firm speak or make you feel (like a lot do) that you are inferior to them (or at least your ideas).
People skills, being human and wanting you to succeed should be the only selection criteria for managing partners.
The problem for a lot of managing partners is that they take on too much. Their focus is ameliorated to such an extent that they never get time to address the fundamental people issue.
Of course most large firms will have a Human Resources department but my experience of such departments is that they are more focused on making sure the correct procedure is followed than listening to people. In fairness they don’t really have the power to make a difference – they know that any major decision will be deferred to one of the partners.
Without wanting to name any of the managing partners that I worked under, the one that stands out was the one who took time to stop by whenever he was in the office, put his head around the door and simply say “Hello Julian. How are you?”
There was no agenda. He seemed genuinely interested, and didn’t automatically jump the fence and ask “Are you busy?” As if I was going to confess to surfing the Net all day because I was bored out of my mind doing crap work!
No, this managing partner made me feel, dare I say, special.
Listening is a strategic skill.
It should be taught at every level from undergraduate to senior partner.
As a skill set it is matchless.
How many courses have you attended on it? I have been on loads where you are taught the art of speaking but not listening.
Isn’t it wonderful when you come across someone who intensely listens? Someone who focuses their attention on you.
As I mentioned in yesterday’s post the people we find most interesting are the people who are most interested in us.
Try it for yourself. Next time you meet with someone just listen.
Don’t do anything else.
Try not to focus on what you think they are about to say.
Don’t steer the conversation in any one way.
Let one question follow on from the next.
And don’t finish the conversation until the other person has finished what they have to say.
If you still want a managing partner then fine but how about changing the job specification to include CLO?
Slow down and listen.
Find out something new about your staff and remember it. Better still act on it, if there is something to act on.
It is the small detail (if you can call listening ‘small’) that can often make the biggest difference.
- Google’s Chief Legal Officer David Drummond rails against patent attacks from Apple and co. (edibleapple.com)
- So you’re an equity partner – big deal! (intelligentchallenge.wordpress.com)